Services & pricing

Defined scope. Defined price. Defined dates.

Before the first line of code, you know what the system will do, when it goes live and what it costs. I plan and build it and put it into operation at your site — and you talk to the same engineer throughout.

Fixed-price packages

Three package sizes, every deliverable visible

A “use case” is one well-bounded workflow — order intake from emails, say, or answer search across your contract archive. Not sure which package fits? That is exactly what the Readiness Check answers.

Small · MVP
€15,000–25,000

2–6 weeks to acceptance

  • One use case, live in production — not a throwaway prototype
  • Agent or knowledge search built on your real data
  • A web interface your team starts using immediately
  • Runs via cloud API or on your servers
  • Documentation and two weeks of post-launch support
Ask about Small
Enterprise · Platform
from €50,000

12–24 weeks to acceptance

  • Several agents working together across processes
  • Custom models where standard ones fall short
  • Deployment up to fully isolated environments
  • Single sign-on, role-based access, compliance review
  • Three months of dedicated post-launch support
Ask about Enterprise
What moves the price within the range: the number of systems to connect, the state of your data, the approval steps required, and whether a standard model suffices or needs adaptation. The offer itemises this. In every package: source code and usage rights transfer fully to you.
Process

From check to acceptance — with a payment plan

No advance into the unknown: you pay at milestones, and acceptance follows criteria written into the offer.

Project flow with payment plan Readiness Check 1–2 weeks · fixed price Offer binding, within 48 h Build working software weekly Maintenance optional package Check fee fully credited 30 % at start 40 % across milestones 30 % at acceptance against acceptance criteria
Commission the build within 3 months of the check and the full check fee is credited against the project price. The acceptance criteria — measurable conditions for “done” — are written into the offer, not the fine print.
“You work with the engineer who writes the code. No account manager, no handover, no junior learning on your project.” Lukas Friedrich · founder of Tippel
Services

What I build

Four building blocks — on their own or combined in one project.

Agents that execute workflows

Software assistants read documents, check them against your data, draft replies and trigger the next step in your existing systems. Sensitive decisions go to a person for approval — every action lands in a log your compliance team can read.

For the IT team
Orchestration with LangGraph/LangChain or AutoGen; models via API (Anthropic, OpenAI, Azure OpenAI) or self-hosted behind an OpenAI-compatible vLLM endpoint — switching is configuration, not a rebuild. Integration with existing systems via REST APIs or direct database access; structured outputs with schema validation, so downstream systems receive reliable data. Guardrails and human-in-the-loop approvals at the points you define; every action lands in an audit-proof log. Delivered as Docker containers, with Kubernetes manifests on request.

Answers from company knowledge

Your employees ask in plain language and get answers with the exact source — respecting access rights. Answer quality is measured, not asserted: before acceptance you see the hit rate on your real documents.

For the IT team
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with a vector database and hybrid search — semantic plus keyword; chunking and metadata per document type instead of one-size-fits-all. Permission mapping onto your existing roles and groups: anyone not allowed to open a document will not get it as an answer either. Every answer carries its source at document and section level. An evaluation pipeline with reference questions from your domain — retrieval quality is measured before acceptance and re-checked after every update; an ingest pipeline keeps the index current as documents change.

Models that speak your language

Where standard models don’t know your terminology, forms or norms, I adapt models to your documents — and demonstrate the improvement against the agreed criteria before delivery.

For the IT team
LoRA/QLoRA fine-tuning of open models with PyTorch; the base model is chosen by benchmark on your data, not by marketing. Training and evaluation data are prepared from your own stock with documented steps; models, datasets and prompts are versioned, every training run reproducible. Delivered quantised for your GPU servers or as a vLLM deployment — with a before/after measurement against the agreed criteria.

Image and sensor data

For manufacturing and engineering, I train models on your image, 3D and measurement data — for in-line quality inspection, for example. Results reach production in seconds.

For the IT team
PyTorch training on GPU and HPC infrastructure (CUDA), from classification and segmentation to 3D volume data. Inference optimised for where it runs — quantised at the edge next to the line, or on a GPU server in the data centre. Integration with control systems and existing software via common interfaces such as REST or OPC UA; latency and detection rates are measured and recorded in the acceptance report.
Where your AI runs

Three paths — chosen by requirements, not ideology

I set up all three paths GDPR-clean, with data processing agreements and documented data flows. The difference lies in time to start, cost profile and control:

 Cloud APIEU cloud, self-hostedYour own servers
ModelsOpenAI, Anthropic or Microsoft AzureOpen models in a German/EU data centreOpen models on your hardware — up to fully air-gapped environments
Time to startDaysWeeksWeeks, plus hardware procurement
Cost profileUsage-based, no own hardwareMonthly server costs, predictableOne-off hardware, low running costs
Your documentsStay in your systems; only the individual request goes to the provider, encrypted (DPA, EU endpoints, no training on your data)Stay entirely in the EU data centreNever leave the building
Typical choice forFast start, variable load, standard confidentiality requirementsUS providers ruled out, predictable costsTrade secrets, classified material, regulated environments

The paths can be mixed: sensitive documents stay in-house while uncritical load runs through the cloud. Which variant fits your case is settled by the Readiness Check — including an operating-cost estimate, not just a build price. Contracts and data flows in detail: Procurement & IT.

After go-live

Optional maintenance: so the system still delivers in month twelve

Commissioning is part of every package. Ongoing operations stay with you — or we put together a maintenance package:

Monitoring & quality

In the maintenance package, answer quality is measured continuously. If the system drifts, I see it before your users do — and fix it.

Updates & evolution

Model and security updates, regression tests after every change, and a monthly engineering allowance for new requirements.

Maintenance package from €1,500/month

Response times and availability are set in the retainer contract — plus a quarterly review with the system’s quality metrics. No retainer, no problem: you receive the system fully documented and take over yourself.

Describe your project — get a real price

A short project description is enough. Within 48 hours I reply with a fixed-price offer, or with the two or three questions still needed for one.